With Covid-19 leading to increasing numbers of people working remotely, organisations will need to think about how documents and contracts can be signed and concluded. While some projects will slow or stall, many routine contracts will be up for renewal in the next few months, and other transactions will be due to complete. The logistics of signing in wet ink may become impractical, with signatories dispersed around the country, with limited access to printing, scanning and post.
Signing electronically can eliminate many of these issues, and allow all parties to sign a document within seconds of being invited to do so. However, to date, many organisations have been reluctant to embrace electronic signatures, as they are unsure of the law and the potential risks.
In order to provide some clarity to those in the profession who do not utilise electronic signing of documents as a matter of course, we were, prior to the Covid-19 outbreak, preparing a ‘Guide to’ for the profession.
Although the guide is not completely finalised we felt that sharing the guide as a ‘beta’ version would be of use to the profession given the current practical difficulties they face at the present time.
We will continue to review and update the guide as necessary and users of the guide should be aware that amendments may be made in the future.
Below are a summary of the points to consider when deciding on whether or not to use an electronic signature.
A signature is simply a way of providing evidence that a person agreed to be bound by the terms of a document or contract.
Under both Scots and English law, the majority of day to day contracts can be created electronically.
The Law Commission for England and Wales last year stated that electronic signatures are valid in most cases. The Law Commission also said that it can see no reason why an English law deed cannot be authenticated electronically, though there are some practical issues when a deed is to be authenticated by way of a witnessed signature.
In Scotland, specific legislation was introduced in 2014 for the electronic authentication of certain documents that must be in writing.
An electronic signature can take many forms – whether using a tick box on web page, sending an email or using some form of secure electronic signature.
When deciding how to sign (or authenticate) electronically, it is essential that a system is used that provides a reasonable level of assurance that the document was authenticated by the person purporting to sign it.
What is appropriate may depend on the nature of the contract or document, the risk of a challenge to the validity of the signature and the consequences of a successful challenge.
For example, simply inserting a JPEG of someone’s wet ink signature into a Word document provides very little assurance.
On the other hand, an online signing platform such as DocuSign or Adobe Sign collects meta data on the signing, including information around the date and time of signing, the email address to which the request to sign was sent, and the IP address of the device. These platforms can also use two factor authentication, where the signatory needs to insert a code that has been sent to a mobile number, which reduces the risk of someone with delegate inbox access signing in someone else’s name.
The most secure form of electronic signature is what is known as a qualified electronic signature. A QES uses cryptography and is issued by a trusted third party. However, because the trusted third party needs to independently validate the entity of the signatory, QES are generally only available in the UK as part of a closed loop system for a particular purpose.
The primary areas where simple electronic signatures, such as the standard functionality in DocuSign and Adobe Sign, are not a valid means of signing are in relation to:
- missives and other documents dealing with the transfer of rights in land;
- certain types of guarantees; and
- where (under Scots law) you wish a document to have self-proving status.
Under Scots law, such documents can only be authenticated electronically where an advanced electronic signature (AES) is used or, where self-proving status is required, a qualified electronic signature (QES). The standard signature functionality within the platforms such as DocuSign or Adobe Sign does not meet the requirements for an AES or QES.
All solicitors registered with the Law Society of Scotland have a QES on their Law Society smartcard, and can therefore authenticate electronically missives and other documents requiring an AES or QES in order to be valid.
There may also be issues where a document needs to be lodged with a registry or relied upon in another jurisdiction.
When looking to use electronic signatures, the following checklist can help:
- Is there any reason that an electronic signature may not be valid for the document you wish to sign?
- Do you need to use a particular form of electronic signature, such as an advanced electronic signature or qualified electronic signature, in order for the signature to be valid?
- If signing electronically, which signing system will you use? If you plan to use a signing platform, are you using additional security features, such as two factor authentication?
- When using a signing platform such as DocuSign or Adobe Sign, one party coordinates signing and issues invitations to the other signatories. Who will do that? If lawyers are involved in the transaction, which firm will take the lead? Agree protocols and procedures in advance.
- Do you need to include any information in your contract or document to state when it will take effect?
- What information will you retain to evidence the signature? Signing platforms usually provide a certificate with the information collected. If you are not coordinating signing, have you requested a copy of that?
This summary is based on a blogpost by Martin Sloan at Brodies LLP and reproduced with permission.
You can find the original version on the Brodies website: https://brodies.com/blog/ip-technology/covid-19-when-is-it-appropriate-to-use-electronic-signatures-under-scots-and-english-law/
Martin Sloan is the Chair of the Electronic Signatures Working Group of the Technology Law and Practice Committee.