Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Art of the possible

Art of the possible

13th September 2016 | europe , government-administration

Governments can talk a good game while frequently failing to deliver. At present it seems there are ways in which both the UK and Scottish Governments are playing for high stakes, without either having much prospect, the interested observer may conclude, of being able to deliver the outcomes they want.

“Brexit means Brexit”, Mrs May and her ministers repeatedly assure us. That is presumably for want of any more revealing definition, as the UK Government is pulled in all directions over what it means in terms of access to the EU single market, immigration controls, non-EU trade agreements and more – little short of Britain's whole place in the world, in fact.

Small wonder that many commentators offer a healthy scepticism over each ministerial announcement, never mind the prospects for the article 50 process or the timescale for actual exit. (Some even doubt whether it will happen at all, though it might be unwise to advise on that basis.) Twitter is a marvellous medium for instant deflating of official statements.

One of the keynote addresses at the Society's annual conference on 30 September (see our feature this month) should be particularly relevant here – commentator David Allan Green's take on “Law and Policy of Brexit”. Professing himself no strong supporter of either Remain or Leave, he has a knack of presenting crucial points in simple but trenchant language, and his presentation should be value for money among what is already a quality lineup.

Meanwhile, the Scottish Government has done its best to generate momentum behind finding a mechanism to keep Scotland in the EU, despite the Prime Minister having now cold-shouldered any such idea, and economic indicators casting serious doubt on whether Scotland on its own could meet the criteria for EU membership. Perhaps energies would be better directed at pressing for the UK to prioritise continued access to the single market, if that is where it believes our interests lie.

Politicians can be regrettably slow to appreciate the extent of global interdependence in the modern world – they certainly have been in the face of the migrant crisis, with EU nations mostly attempting to pass the problem on to someone else. Lawyers have been good at standing up for the international legal order in defending the European Convention on Human Rights against threats to continued UK participation. Any erecting of international barriers is likely to have unintended, and unwelcome, consequences in many areas covered by treaties, conventions and protocols, and as a profession we should be seeking to highlight these and press for policymakers to take them properly into account before they set our direction.

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited