Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Contact: no presumption here?

Contact: no presumption here?

9th September 2014 | family-child law

While the introduction of mandatory mediation arrived in a flurry of headlines, the abolition of residence and contact as part of the family law reforms in England & Wales received less publicity. Instead, courts will now make a child arrangement order.

It is now enshrined that the court should also presume, unless it is shown to the contrary, that involvement of a parent in a child’s life will promote the child’s welfare.

Here, such an approach was specifically rejected by Sheriff Principal Scott in KA v KS, an unusual example of a contact order being overturned on appeal.

Specifically, it appeared the sheriff was wrong to proceed on the basis that there was a presumption in favour of contact flowing from the “parental link”.

The sheriff failed to carry out the required balancing exercise and properly consider what was in the best interests of the child. The sheriff’s judgment was silent on why contact should be reinstated and failed to identify material supportive of disturbing the status quo, which was that no contact was taking place between the father and child.

KA v KS, Glasgow Sheriff Court, 10 April 2014

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited