Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Home Office discrimination claim upheld

Home Office discrimination claim upheld

18th April 2017 | employment

In Home Office (UK Visas & Immigration) v Kuranchie (UKEAT/0202/16/BA) the EAT held that the Home Office discriminated against a senior official on grounds of disability, and, pending a reconsideration by an employment tribunal, possibly on grounds of race.

Pearl Kuranchie, a highly-qualified black Ghanaian, was promoted to a senior post in the Visas & Immigration section in London in 2007. In 2011 she was promoted to team leader, and subsequently acted-up as assistant director.

In early 2013 she advised her line manager that she suffered from dyspraxia and dyslexia. It was agreed that specialist equipment would be obtained for her. In mid-2013 her annual performance assessment was downgraded. Kuranchie submitted that the downgrading had arisen because one of the panel members had previously exhibited and endorsed racist behaviour. The ET rejected this case, saying there was no evidence to support it.

The EAT upheld the ET’s finding of disability discrimination, and held that the ET had been wrong to dismiss the complaint of race discrimination, because Kuranchie had provided sufficient evidence to shift the burden of proof onto the Home Office.

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited