Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Letter: Human rights – the best farce in town

Letter: Human rights – the best farce in town

20th January 2013 | human rights

Human rights have poisoned our legal system and have reduced aspects of it, both criminal and civil, to the point of farce. When our legal system descends into farce, we should stop – and ask ourselves how we got here and what should be done about it.

The rights themselves, as contained in the European Convention on Human Rights ( ECHR) and incorporated, without amendment, in the Human Rights Act 1998, are farcical, given that they were drafted with a view to preventing genocide and not to regulating the criminal and civil aspects of a sophisticated legal system.

In relation to our criminal law, we have had the dreaded decision in Cadder, as a result of which convictions have been quashed and prosecutions have been dropped. But it is in relation to our civil law that a new and exciting farce is unfolding, namely, the challenging of Acts of the Scottish Parliament on the grounds that they are not ECHR compliant. For pity’s sake! This is farcical since no lawyer, when interpreting such an Act, can be expected to sit back and ponder about whether it is ECHR compliant. That question is a subjective one and in most cases it is impossible to predict the outcome of judicial decisions. We might as well toss a coin.

I have every sympathy with judges who are forced to play a part in these farces and wrestle with these human rights. There is only one solution, and that is the complete repeal of the human rights legislation. If, which I deny, it is necessary for new rights to be substituted for human rights, we must all hope and pray that they will be drafted, introduced and interpreted in such a way as to avoid the poisoning of our legal system.

Roy Johnstone (retired solicitor), Edinburgh

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited