Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Blogs & opinions
  4. Union liable for non-employee officers

Union liable for non-employee officers

18th April 2017 | employment

An important reminder that organisations can be liable for the discriminatory acts of their officers and officials as well as their employees was issued by the Employment Appeal Tribunal in Nailard v Unite the Union (UKEAT/0300/15/BA).

Sally Nailard was a regional official employed by Unite the Union. Two Unite officers employed at Heathrow subjected her to sexual harassment. She complained and the union decided to deal with her complaint by offering her a move to a different region. She resigned and claimed she had been constructively dismissed and subjected to sexual discrimination. At first instance, the employment tribunal held that the lay union officers were employees of the union, and went on to find that Ms Nailard had been sexually harassed and unfairly dismissed. The union appealed.

The EAT held that the lay officers were not employees but were authorised agents of the union. It also held that the ET had not considered whether the union’s decision to relocate Nailard was in itself an act of sex discrimination. It remitted the case to the same tribunal for reconsideration.

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited