Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Child abuse time bar change has resource implications, Faculty warns

Child abuse time bar change has resource implications, Faculty warns

19th January 2017 | civil litigation , reparation

Relaxing the rules on time bar in civil cases alleging historical child abuse is likely to have resource implications for the courts, the Faculty of Advocates has predicted.

In its submission to Holyrood's Justice Committee on the Limitation (Childhood Abuse) (Scotland) Bill, Faculty believes that an increase in the number of complicated cases is likely to result from the removal from such actions of the general three year limitation period for personal injury claims.

The committee has invited views on issues including the impact of the exemption on victims, those who might be sued, and the courts. Having previously opposed the measure, the Faculty comments are directed to the "mechanics" of the proposed change – while arguing that if the change is to be made, it should apply to all cases of alleged abuse and not only those in a care setting.

“It is likely that there will be an increase in the number of court actions. These actions are likely to be complicated and to involve evidential difficulties. These features generate resource implications for the courts”, Faculty states.

“As far as individuals involved in such cases are concerned… litigation is inherently stressful, with this subject matter being particularly so. Significant emotional impact on those raising actions, and on any surviving individuals against whom allegations are made, appears inevitable.”

It was “an important safeguard” in the bill that the court could dismiss a case if the defender demonstrated that it would not be possible for a fair hearing to take place, or that the defender would be subject to substantial prejudice if the case did proceed.

“We would suggest that there might be clarification as to… which factors it is intended should be taken into account”, the response adds.

Click here to view the full response. 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited