Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Commission and diligence in family actions works, Faculty argues

Commission and diligence in family actions works, Faculty argues

20th May 2016 | civil litigation , family-child law

Leave well alone, is the response by the Faculty of Advocates to suggestions that the law needs to be changed in relation to the way commission and diligence is exercised in family actions in the civil courts.

Faculty has released its submission on a Scottish Government consultation that asked for views on the current law and practice. Ministers believe there is a potential issue over information that a child has shared confidentially with a support worker or psychologist being obtained through this procedure.

However, Faculty believes that there are sufficient protections in place, as the 2012 Supreme Court case of A (A Child) sets out how to apply the human rights considerations, which would be binding on the Scottish courts and was applied this year in the Court of Session in the case of WF. 

"There is an expectation of confidentiality between the child and the service provider, and the decision of the court, in carrying out the balancing exercise required, must have the interests of the child as its paramount consideration", Faculty states.

“We are of the view that the law in this area does not require to be changed… the practice and procedure generally works well, and there is no need for any changes in this area.”

Click here to view the response.

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited