Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

    • Lawscot Tech

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Court holds unqualified adviser to same standard as qualified lawyer

Court holds unqualified adviser to same standard as qualified lawyer

19th March 2019 | reparation

An unqualified "legal adviser" should be held to the same standard of competence as a qualified lawyer if they held themselves out as equivalent, the High Court in London has ruled.

The Law Society Gazette has reported an award of damages and costs totalling £337,000 against George Rusz and Romford business Troy Lucas & Co, for the negligent handling of a clinical negligence case. 

The case was brought by Paul Wright, who was left permanently disabled after an operation at Basildon & Thurrock University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. He claimed that the negligence of Mr Rusz and his firm left him without evidence, and winning a basic claim but being left with five-figure costs, and that Mr Rusz held out his firm’s advice as coming from qualified lawyers, giving him a contract to sign which implied that people with legal qualifications worked there and that it was regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.

Defences that there was no contract or duty of care owed were dismissed by the court.

Unregulated and unqualified advisers have proliferated in England & Wales since severe restrictions were imposed on the availability of civil legal aid.

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited