Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Court refuses landlords' tenancy deposit appeal

Court refuses landlords' tenancy deposit appeal

30th January 2015 | Housing

The Court of Session has refused to interfere with a sheriff's exercise of discretion in awarding the maximum payment to tenants whose deposit was wrongly withheld by their landlords.

Three Inner House judges pointed out, in a case where the parties on each side presented their own case, that an appellate court had a limited role in reviewing such a decision, and "will interfere only, for example, where the court below has not exercised its discretion at all, taken into account irrelevant considerations, or failed to take into account relevant ones. It is not sufficient merely that the appellate court might have come to a different decision on the facts".

Sheriff Principal Derek Pyle, who delivered the opinion of the court where he sat along with Lord Drummond Young and Lord Malcolm, said that although the landlords has argued that the retention had only been for 34 days and the regulations were new and complex, the sheriff had set out his reasons in detail and was entitled to regard the defenders' breach as a serious one where, among other things, the landlords had chosen not to register the deposit with one of the approved schemes despite having over four months to do so.

In the case, the landlords had purported to make deductions from the £750 deposit paid and returned only a balance of £327.77. The sheriff awarded three times the original deposit, or £2,250, the maximum permitted under the relevant regulations.

Click here to view the opinion.

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited