Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Human rights court upholds compulsory mixed swimming for Muslim girls

Human rights court upholds compulsory mixed swimming for Muslim girls

10th January 2017 | education-training , human rights

Muslim parents who were refused an exemption for their daughters, who were below the age of puberty, from compulsory mixed swimming lessons as part of their school education, did not suffer a breach of their human rights, the European Court of Human Rights ruled today.

In Osmanoǧlu and Kocabaş v Switzerland a chamber of the Strasbourg court found that the authorities’ refusal to grant the exemption had been an interference with the parents' freedom of religion, but was one that was prescribed by law and pursued a legitimate aim, the protection of foreign pupils from any form of social exclusion.

The seven judges unanimously ruled that school played a special role in the process of social integration, particularly where children of foreign origin were concerned, and that the children’s interest in a full education, facilitating their successful social integration according to local customs and mores, took precedence over the parents’ wishes in this matter. The children’s interest in attending swimming lessons was not just to learn to swim, but above all to take part in that activity with all the other pupils, with no exception on account of the children’s origin or their parents’ religious or philosophical convictions.

They noted that the authorities had offered the applicants very flexible arrangements to reduce the impact of the children’s attendance at mixed swimming classes on the applicants' religious convictions, such as allowing their daughters to wear a burkini. There had also been an accessible procedure for the applicants to have the merits of their application for an exemption examined.

The domestic authorities had therefore not exceeded the considerable margin of appreciation afforded to them in the present case.

Click here to view the judgment (French only).

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited