Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Iraqi claims for forces' wrongs held time barred by UK Supreme Court

Iraqi claims for forces' wrongs held time barred by UK Supreme Court

12th May 2016 | reparation

Iraqi civilians who sought to sue the UK Government over alleged unlawful detention and/or physical maltreatment by British forces in Iraq have lost their cases on the basis of time bar.

The UK Supreme Court today upheld a Court of Appeal decision that an order providing immunity for coalition forces from Iraqi legal process and jurisdiction had not effect outside Iraq, and could not prevent the relevant three year limitation period running against the claimants in actions brought in the UK.

The decision, in cases brought by 14 lead claimants out of 600 similar claims, turned on the effect of the Foreign Limitation Periods Act 1984, which provides that where a claim is brought in England which is governed by a foreign law, the English courts are to apply the foreign law of limitation.

At first instance the judge held that the limitation period was suspended as the order constituted an impediment rendering it impossible for the plaintiff to claim his right, in terms of the Iraqi Civil Code.

Reversing him, the Court of Appeal held that the order (which was still in force) was a mere procedural bar that did not apply to proceedings in England. The UK Supreme Court agreed, though applied different reasons. Lord Sumption, giving the unanimous judgment of the court, said that the order was not an impediment to the only relevant proceedings, which were in England. It did not therefore suspend the running of the Iraqi law limitation period.

The court was not disapplying Iraqi law, but applying its principles different facts. "The facts relevant to proceedings in England are not necessarily the same as those which would be relevant to proceedings in Iraq", he concluded.

Click here to view the judgment.

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited