Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Lawyer warns of competition law risk from price setting software

Lawyer warns of competition law risk from price setting software

4th July 2018 | consumer

Businesses that use high-tech optimisation tools to analyse data and prices could inadvertently end up in breach of competition law, a specialist lawyer warned today.

Michael Dean, a partner in the Competition team at global law firm Dentons’ Glasgow office, said that this increasingly popular software – now backed by data analysis and machine-learning systems – could, under the right circumstances, be viewed as price-fixing by competition authorities. If firms were not careful to ensure their data, in particular data driving commercial decisions, was not disclosed to any competitors, they could face serious charges.

"Price optimisation" has become popular, especially among online retailers. It is often used by online marketplace sellers, to make sure their prices are not being undercut by competitors, but increasingly sophisticated versions of such tools are now being offered to businesses in all sectors. They allow companies to rapidly see changes in competitors’ pricing, and set strategies of their own, which can include "dynamic pricing" and rapid, automated price changes.

Mr Dean explained: "A European Commission investigation found that two thirds of retailers who track their competitors’ prices use automatic systems. Some also use such tools to adjust prices automatically, and several direct competitors could easily end up using the same provider. Logically, if a tool is initiating price changes in a fast-moving market it may be possible for it to be analysing the same data and providing the same pricing instructions.

"A business may not be aware of this, or even what data is effectively being shared with its competitors, but ignorance is no defence: the European Commissioner for Competition stated last year that companies 'can't escape responsibility by hiding behind a computer program'."

Mr Dean said firms should be alert to this and any other way in which sales or even purchase data are capable of being revealed. He added that a recent case where pricing software was deliberately used by two online sellers to collude on prices saw one company director disqualified and facing extradition to the US to face further charges.

He added: "These solutions can undoubtedly be effective at increasing profit margins or helping to gain customers, but companies who use them must conduct due diligence beforehand. It is essential to understand how they work; what information is effectively being shared; and to keep it independent from competing businesses.

"Otherwise, firms face serious consequences: fines, director disqualification, and extradition to the US. These are best avoided by taking charge of the situation."

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited