Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Solicitor struck off for indecent images offences

Solicitor struck off for indecent images offences

13th April 2016 | professional regulation

A solicitor has been struck off the roll of solicitors after being convicted of two offences involving the use of indecent images of children.

John Urquhart of Kirkcaldy, who had retired from practice but remained on the roll, was found guilty of professional misconduct by the Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal after being convicted on indictment of two offences under s 52 of the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982. These involved the downloading from the internet of 75 images over a three year period to 2013, and sharing several of them with other people on one occasion. He had been given a community payback order and made subject to the notification requirements for sex offenders for a three year period. 

In its decision the tribunal said that if the public were to have trust in the profession, it had to observe a high standard of conduct, and this requirement of integrity applied equally to a solicitor’s private life as it did to his professional conduct. This type of offending behaviour was considered by society to be serious and abhorrent, and the tribunal had no hesitation in unanimously finding the respondent guilty of professional misconduct.

It was accepted that the number and nature of the images involved were at the lower end of the scale, and that the respondent was remorseful and regretful and previously had a clear record. Ultimately however the question that required to be answered was whether or not a conviction of this nature was compatible with an individual being on the roll of solicitors, and given the extremely damaging effect of such conduct on the reputation of and public confidence in the profession, the only possible sanction was to strike the respondent's name from the roll.

Click here to view the full decision.

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited