Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Stealing food not a crime for the destitute, Italian court rules

Stealing food not a crime for the destitute, Italian court rules

4th May 2016 | criminal law

Italy's highest court has quashed the conviction of a man caught taking cheese and sausages from a supermarket – on the ground that stealing small amounts of food to stave off hunger is not a crime.

The Court of Cassation ruled that "immediate and essential need for nourishment" amounted to necessity, in the case of Roman Ostriakov, a homeless Ukranian man who attempted to leave a supermarket with two pieces of cheese and a packet of sausages worth €4.07 in his pocket, paying only for breadsticks. It overturned his conviction and sentence of six months in jail and a €100 fine.

It was clear, the judges stated, that the defendant “could not live without feeding himself, so acted out of necessity”. Therefore, it was not a crime.

They had regard to the condition of the defendant and the circumstances in which the seizure of the merchandise took place, as proving "that he took possession of that small amount of food in the face of an immediate and essential need for nourishment, acting therefore in a state of necessity", according to reports.

The judgement “reminds everyone that in a civilised country not even the worst of men should starve”.

 

 

Add To Favorites
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited