Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Campbell loses defamation appeal in Dugdale case

Campbell loses defamation appeal in Dugdale case

27th May 2020 | reparation

"Wings over Scotland" blogger Stuart Campbell has lost his appeal at the Court of Session against the rejection of his defamation case against former MSP and Scottish Labour Party leader Kezia Dugdale.

Mr Campbell complained about a newspaper article by Ms Dugdale, written in response to a social media tweet of his, in which she said he was homophobic and had "spouted hatred and homophobia towards others".

After proof the sheriff ruled that, although Ms Dugdale’s article contained an innuendo that Mr Campbell was homophobic, this was a comment rather than an assertion of facts and therefore the defence of "fair comment" could be used, and had been established.

On appeal Mr Campbell argued that Ms Dugdale’s words had been presented as fact and the defence of fair comment could not be used. In any event the comment had not been based on accurate facts and so was not "fair".

Delivering the opinion of the court, Lord President Carloway, who sat with Lord Menzies and Lord Brodie, said Ms Dugdale’s article was defamatory because it stated that Mr Campbell had sent homophobic tweets, i.e. that he was homophobic, but that it was presented as comment rather than fact and was fair comment. "It is important to look at both the visual and textual context in which the article appears", he stated. "The defender’s article is at the top of a page which is dedicated to the defender’s views on political and other topics. It is not part of a news reporting section. It is accompanied by pieces on female equality, trades unions in supermarkets, the Conservatives’ austerity programme and the fortunes of Hibernian FC. The context points towards the piece being one of opinion rather than fact. 

"The court agrees with the sheriff’s conclusion that this was indeed fair comment. The pursuer’s tweet was a derogatory remark containing a gratuitous reference to [Conservative MSP] Oliver Mundell’s father’s homosexuality.” While Ms Dugdale’s comments might have been expressed in strong, if not inflammatory, words, insulting language did not prevent fair comment as a defence.

Had Mr Campbell won his appeal, the court would have increased the damages awarded by the sheriff from £100 to £5,000, as "the correct approach is to make an award of some substance, even when there has been no serious impact on a person’s reputation".

Click here to view the opinion of the court.

 

 

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Professional practice test applied to treatment advice
  • PI discount rate factors: views sought ahead of review
  • Friends sharing house could found unjust enrichment case
  • Childhood abuse case pursuers win “fair hearing” appeal
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited