Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Complaint withholding details of locus ruled competent

Complaint withholding details of locus ruled competent

12th April 2021 | criminal law | Criminal court work

It was competent for the Crown to charge the locus of an offence as being “at an address known to the Prosecutor within the jurisdiction of Kilmarnock Sheriff Court”, where the circumstances of the case made it necessary to do so, the Sheriff Appeal Court has held.

Appeal Sheriffs Norman McFadyen, Lorna Drummond QC and Fiona Tait gave the decision in refusing the appeal by an accused, MK, against the decision of Sheriff Jamieson to repel preliminary pleas to the relevancy and competency of a complaint.

MK faced three charges under the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009, two under s 8 (sexual exposure during an online video call) and one under s 7 (indecent communication via an online platform), each with the alternative of a charge involving an older child (ss 35 and 34 of the Act respectively).

Following debate the sheriff allowed the Crown to amend each charge by stating the town within the sheriff court district in which each offence was said to have taken place.

On appeal it was argued for MK that the original complaint was incompetent for want of specific locus, and therefore fundamentally null and incapable of being cured by amendment. The court had also been deprived of information to satisfy it that there was jurisdiction.

Sheriff Drummond, delivering the opinion of the court, said it was important to distinguish between objections to competency and relevancy. The former might arise where the court had no jurisdiction to try the crime charged. However in the court's view it did have jurisdiction, which was fixed by reference to the sheriffdom.

Here the charges sufficiently specified the locus as originally drafted, containing sufficient information to establish that the locus was within the court's jurisdiction. It was open to the prosecutor, under the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, sched 3, para 4(3) to take exceptional latitude where the circumstances of the case made it necessary to do so. There was no need to specify the circumstances in the libel.

She continued: “In our view, exceptional latitude is reasonable in the circumstances of the present case. The loci of where the complainers reside is not the essence of the charges which are alleged offences committed via social media. Disclosure of the complainers' addresses could be harmful to the complainers and may potentially breach their rights under article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

“We are unable to identify any prejudice to the appellant by not knowing the complainers' addresses within the sheriffdom. We note that the appellant in the grounds of appeal states that 'Neither the appellant nor those representing him have any desire to know the particular addresses of the complainers.' If the appellant does not seek specification of the complainers' addresses, it is unclear what the appellant's complaint is in this appeal. For these reasons, we hold that the complaint as originally libelled was competent.”

Click here to view the opinion of the court.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Jury trials to return to the islands in spring
  • SCTS revises criminal case backlog predictions
  • Current justice funding model unsustainable: MSP report
  • Crime figures up 3% in first full post-Covid year
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited