Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Faculty voices dismay at lack of remote hearings

Faculty voices dismay at lack of remote hearings

9th April 2020 | civil litigation

Dismay at the lack of progress in enabling civil court business to be conducted remotely during the lockdown period has been voiced by the Faculty of Advocates.

In a letter to the Scottish Courts & Tribunals Service (SCTS) and Humza Yousaf, Cabinet Secretary for Justice, Vice Dean of Faculty Roddy Dunlop QC warns that the prevailing "mothballing" approach is putting the financial futures of firms of solicitors and members of Faculty "at real risk".

Mr Dunlop said it had been pleasing to learn in recent days that Inner House business in the Court of Session was to recommence, remotely, from 21 April. As is happening in England, hearings in Scotland could be accommodated within Government coronavirus guidance by the use of video and other technology.

“However," he continued, "I am dismayed at the suggestion that nothing else will happen during lockdown, so far as non-urgent business is concerned. I urge a rethink."

Contrasting the position south of the border, where the Lord Chief Justice has confirmed that arrangements are in place to allow as many hearings as possible to take place remotely, Mr Dunlop pointed out: "In Scotland, the stated position of SCTS is that all non-urgent business is stalled. In England & Wales, the express position is quite to the contrary: namely that they are putting in place arrangements to use telephone, video and other technology to continue as many hearings as possible remotely.

“Many parties to litigation have a choice of forum… If every Scots case is mothballed whilst the English act flexibly, future litigants are unlikely to look favourably north of the border" – despite recent efforts to promote Scotland as a forum for resolving disputes.

"I do not suggest for a second that any member of court staff should be put at risk, [but]… there are readily available solutions for at least the resumption of procedural business, and the Faculty will do anything it can to facilitate this… the sheriff court has conducted procedural hearings by way of telephone conferencing for years."

In a new English appeal decision, Chancellor Sir Geoffrey Vos has described how the case was conducted entirely remotely by the use of Skype for Business, "in an attempt to demonstrate the flexibility of the arrangements that can be made, with the cooperation of the parties and their lawyers, to continue to deliver fair, open and transparent justice in a period of national difficulty".

Click here to view the full letter from Mr Dunlop.

 

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Tea pickers' claim better brought in Kenya: Inner House
  • Ministers set out justice programme through to 2026
  • Fee rises and more cases raise legal aid bill by 14%
  • SLAB consults about A&A and ABWOR policies
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited