Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Hearts, Partick relegation dispute sent to arbitration

Hearts, Partick relegation dispute sent to arbitration

3rd July 2020 | dispute resolution

Hearts and Partick Thistle football clubs have had the legal battle to prevent their relegation referred to arbitration by a Court of Session judge.

Lord Clark agreed with the Scottish Professional Football League, and the clubs seeking to have their promotion confirmed (Dundee United, Raith Rovers and Cove Rangers), that the dispute was a "football dispute" in terms of article 99.7 of the articles of association of the Scottish Football Association, by which the parties were contractually bound, and which therefore had to be settled by arbitration in terms of articles 99.13 to 99.19.

The judge held that although the respondents sought dismissal of the petition, the appropriate course was to sist it: complex legal issues had been raised which made it inappropriate to deal with dismissal at that stage. These included a restriction (though not a complete prohibition) in the SFA's articles as to taking court proceedings without the consent of the SFA's board, and a provision authorising severe penalties for a breach of that restriction, given that the petition was brought on the grounds of unfairly prejudicial conduct by the SFA in relation to the resolution which gave rise to the petitioners' relegation.

These were matters that would require a full legal debate, Lord Clark ruled, adding: "I conclude that the nature and relative complexity of these issues makes it inappropriate that I deal with the question of dismissing the petition at this early stage. I therefore refuse the motion on behalf of Dundee United, Raith Rovers and Cove Rangers to have this petition dismissed."

However he rejected an argument for the petitioners that the court was not bound to send the case to arbitration because the respondents had taken steps to answer the court process, in terms of s 10(1) of the Arbitration (Scotland) Act 2010. He followed English case law that if any responses were subject to the clear qualification that a sist for arbitration was requested, then no step had been taken which should bar the request for arbitration; and also followed an English decision that allegations of unfair prejudice could suitably be determined by arbitration. Nor did the fact that there were only 28 days until the start of the new season make the arbitration agreement incapable of being performed.

In any event, if the court had a discretion in the matter, it was appropriate to sist for arbitration, despite the public interest in the case: Scottish courts had been clear that an agreement to go to arbitration should be upheld.

He granted the petitioners an order for recovery of documents in order to help speed the process: "the approach I take to the recovery of documents in a dispute of this nature, significance and urgency is to require the parties to put their cards on the table".

Click here to view Lord Clark's note of reasons.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Civil procedure mediation scheme to be rolled out
  • Scottish Arbitration Centre signs disputes agreement
  • Scottish Arbitration Centre launches arbitrator panels
  • Naomi Pryde becomes a Scottish Arbitration Centre Ambassador
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited