Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Public boards law able to count trans people as women

Public boards law able to count trans people as women

24th March 2021 | human rights , government-administration , corporate | Discrimination , Public sector

The Scottish Government acted lawfully in including trans women in an equal opportunities measure to improve women’s representation on public boards, a Court of Session judge has ruled. 

Lady Wise gave her decision in rejecting a judicial review challenge by the organisation For Women Scotland, which claimed that provisions of the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 concerned matters reserved to Westminster and were also incompatible with EU law and with the UN Convention o the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women ("CEDAW").

The Act, which aims to ensure that 50% of non-executive public board members are women, includes all transgender women who are living as women, including those without a gender recognition certificate, within the definition.

For the petitioners it was argued that the Equality Act 2010, which formed part of the law concerning equal opportunities, preserved the distinction between sex and gender, and because positive action measures were on the face of it a breach of the general principle of equal treatment, the legislative exception allowing them was strictly hedged and bounded both procedurally and substantively. As a positive action measure, the 2018 Act had to identify a disadvantaged group or insufficiently represented group and comply with the requirements of the 2010 Act, in particular ss 158 and 159. In extending to persons who did not share the protected characteristic of sex (as women), it failed to do this.

Lady Wise ruled that the 2018 Act fell within the exception to the reservation of equality law to Westminster that permitted the Scottish Parliament to legislate for equal opportunities to public boards. The exception covered "any aspect of equal opportunities that falls within the scope of 'relating to the inclusion of persons with protected characteristics' on Scottish 41 public boards".

"I have concluded that the very specific and clearly defined devolved power in play in this case allows the inclusion of persons with more than one protected characteristic, as the plural form is used in the exception to the reservation", she held.

The petitioners had also failed to identify respects in which the Act contravened the Human Rights Convention or the other international agreements founded on; nor did it contravene the public sector equality duty.

Vic Valentine, manager of Scottish Trans, which was granted permission to intervene in the case, commented: "We are delighted that Lady Wise has held that the Scottish Government were able to include trans women in this legislation aimed at increasing women’s representation on Scottish public boards. This is an important decision: clearly stating that this equal opportunities measure for women that explicitly includes trans women in line with how they live their lives did not breach the law.

"We know that trans women continue to have almost no visibility in public life: whether that is in boardrooms, council chambers or Parliaments. We hope that any trans woman who has felt unsure about applying for a position on a Scottish public board due to this judicial review will be reassured by this decision."

Click here to view the opinion.

 

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Consultation explores support for learning disabilities
  • Ministers will not appeal s 35 ruling, nor withdraw bill
  • MSP committee majority backs Visitor Levy Bill
  • Too many Commissioners? MSPs to investigate
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited