Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Restriction of liberty order wrong for witness contempt

Restriction of liberty order wrong for witness contempt

24th September 2020 | criminal law | Criminal court work

Punishment for contempt of court is not a sentence, and a restriction of liberty order is not a competent penalty on a finding of contempt, the Sheriff Appeal Court has held.

The court gave the ruling on an appeal by Ceiryn Meade – which it held should have been brought by bill of suspension, and treated as such – against the imposition of such an order after he failed to appear as a witness at a summary trial for which he had been cited personally.

No issue was taken as to the finding of contempt, though Sheriff Principal Mhairi Stephen QC, who sat with Sheriff Principal Marysia Lewis and Appeal Sheriff Norman Macfadyen, said in delivering the opinion of the court that the sheriff had not explained why he had rejected the explanation the the appellant had forgotten his citation, which made it difficult for the appellate court to address the suitability of punishment.

Turning to the penalty imposed, she noted that the sheriff's report used the language of conviction and sentence, "and it seems clear that he was, to some extent at least, treating this as a matter of sentence where he had at his disposal all of his sentencing powers".

However the penalties for contempt were found in s 15 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, and as respects the failure of a witness to attend in a summary case, in s 155(1) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 – a fine up to level 3 on the standard scale, or imprisonment up to 21 days. There was no provision for alternatives to imprisonment such as a restriction of liberty order.

The sheriff had also proceeded to "sentence" when the appellant was first brought before him, but the "more common and safer approach" in such cases was to defer punishment, if a finding of contempt was made, to the date of the adjourned trial, which would provide the opportunity to purge any contempt at least to some extent. 

Where the witness did not admit the contempt, the court "should be cautious about proceeding immediately to a finding of contempt unless the explanation offered is manifestly absurd". In any event it was important that there was a full minute, including the reasons for any finding.

The sheriff principal concluded by stating that the court would quash the order, and "In the particular circumstances of this case we do not find it necessary to make any further order."

Click here to view the opinion of the court.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Jury trials to return to the islands in spring
  • SCTS revises criminal case backlog predictions
  • Current justice funding model unsustainable: MSP report
  • Crime figures up 3% in first full post-Covid year
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited