Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Views sought on powers over unauthorised building works

Views sought on powers over unauthorised building works

10th October 2023 | Construction

Stronger powers for local authorities to take action against building works undertaken without a warrant are proposed in a new Scottish Government consultation. 

The exercise follows reviews of building standards that have taken place since the Grenfell Tower fire tragedy in 2017, which also identified the need for improving aspects of the enforcement of both procedural matters and non-compliant work.

The current enforcement powers are considered adequate for local authorities to take action on work where it does not meet building regulations or not in accordance with a building warrant. However it is thought advisable to strengthen existing enforcement powers of local authorities and increase penalties for offences to act as a deterrent to persons who commit offences under the Act.

The consultation covers proposals to:

  • include owners (as well as occupiers) in the offences for occupation without completion (s 21 of the Act);
  • include removal of work, introduce a standalone stop notice, and clarify the scope of s 27 to take action after acceptance of a completion certificate for higher risk buildings (“HRBs”), with a time limit for serving enforcement notices (s 27); and
  • increase penalties for offences (s 48) that will also apply to offences by bodies corporate etc (s 49).

Introducing a new provision for the removal of work would give local authorities more flexibility on how the situation is remedied with building owners, some of whom would rather remove the work than make changes to existing work. The Act currently does not make provision for work to be removed, only that work meets building regulations.

While s 27 also gives local authorities powers to suspend (stop) work, views from local authorities are that a standalone "stop notice" would send a stronger and more effective message to actors that there are consequences to their actions, and would provide useful evidence should the local authority be required to take formal action including prosecution.

Currently there is doubt over the use of s 27 for local authorities to take action after acceptance of the completion certificate, and this would be made clear, with a proposed time for serving notices (requiring removal or alteration of non-compliant work) of up to 10 years.

The penalties under s 48 would be amended by:

  • increasing the level of fine from level 5 on the standard scale to £50,000;
  • introducing a two-year custodial sentence; and
  • option for fine and/or custodial sentence.

Access the consultation here. The closing date for responses is 15 January 2024.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited