Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. May 2012

May 2012

Arguments in store
Has the Supreme Court decision in Tesco v Dundee City Council torpedoed planning’s sequential approach as we know it?
Farming the constitution
Briefing on Salvesen v Riddell, where the court found s 72(8) and (9) of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003 to be ultra vires the Scottish Parliament
Willing to wound, yet afraid to strike?
Essential elements of UK law on groundless threats of intellectual property rights infringement, and steps that can be taken to manage the risk
Deferred consideration – worth the paper?
Problems of getting the contractual balance right in this fact of life in the current corporate deal market
OSCR: the secondees' perspective
Two charity lawyers' experiences as secondees under the programme developed by the regulator
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Arguments in store
  • Farming the constitution
  • Willing to wound, yet afraid to strike?
  • Deferred consideration – worth the paper?
  • OSCR: the secondees' perspective
  • To efficiency and beyond
  • Reading for pleasure
  • Opinion column: Fraser Tait
  • Council profile
  • Book reviews
  • President's column
  • Wind farms: a challenge to registration
  • Snail of the century
  • Rights both ways
  • Sell, sell, sell
  • RBS v Wilson: light in the tunnel?
  • Take the heat out
  • Prepare for case management
  • Looking into the past
  • Migrant days numbered
  • CPI - the story so far
  • Brighton declares
  • Mary Mary quite contrary?
  • How to avoid that Guarantee Fund interview, and worse...
  • Law reform roundup
  • Apportionment of price for SDLT
  • Business checklist
  • Practical guide to legal risks
  • Ask Ash

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited