Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. March 2022
  6. Cryptocurrency? No thank you

Cryptocurrency? No thank you

Five reasons why the author's firm will not be taking payment or paying its consultant solicitors in cryptocurrency
14th March 2022 | Brian Inkster

A fee-share law firm has announced that it is the first top 200 UK law firm to take payment in cryptocurrency. It claims this means it can work with a wider variety of clients, and its “partners” (self-employed consultant solicitors) can be paid how they choose.

It is, of course, not the first law firm to do so in the UK, with others having done so as early as 2013.

Inksters (one of the first fee-share law firms in Scotland) will not be following suit. I have five reasons why:

  1. Volatility

Cryptocurrencies can fluctuate widely in value. Inksters would not expect its consultant solicitors to agree a fee in ether that might end up being a small fraction of the pound sterling equivalent on payment.

  1. Lack of regulation

The current lack of regulation in the cryptocurrency market has seen many scams, hacks and market manipulations. It is therefore not an area that Inksters would wish to be seen in or have its consultant solicitors be part of.

  1. Money laundering

Cryptocurrencies are susceptible to money laundering activity. The predominant reason is anonymity. Individuals and criminal organisations can mask their true identities by using different aliases and pseudonyms, essentially allowing transactions to be conducted anonymously.

  1. Slow and cumbersome

Due to their complexity and their encrypted, distributed nature, blockchain transactions can take a while to process, compared to traditional payment systems such as cash or debit cards. Bitcoin transactions can take several hours to finalise.

  1. Environmental harm

Cryptocurrency transactions use a huge amount of computing power and vast amounts of energy. The electricity used per year to mine bitcoin surpasses the annual energy usage of many countries in the world.

For these reasons, Inksters will continue to take payment, and pay its consultant solicitors, in good old fashioned pounds sterling.

The Author

Brian Inkster is CEO of Inksters

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: March 2022
  • Book reviews: March 2022
  • Reading for pleasure: March 2022

Perspectives

  • Opinion: Martin O'Brien
  • President's column: March 2022
  • Editorial: International order
  • Viewpoints: Endless arrear?
  • Profile: Elaine MacGlone

Features

  • Forward to the office
  • Fair compensation?
  • Pause for thought
  • FoI: rights needing a new law
  • Prepare for the great tax catch-up

Briefings

  • Civil court: Redaction – completing the picture
  • Corporate: Pandemic procurement: proper preferences?
  • Intellectual property: NFTs and IP rights
  • Agriculture: latest from the Land Court
  • Succession: Changes to reporting for excepted estates
  • Sport: Fan pressure and questions of morality
  • Property: New code for new homes
  • In-house: Democracy behind the scenes

In practice

  • Society Fellows speak out for legal aid
  • Strategy session draws a crowd
  • Ask Ash: Back to the old ways?
  • AML: time for a review, but how?
  • Cryptocurrency? No thank you
  • Going phishing
  • Race: time to be open
  • The Eternal Optimist: IT for dummies

Online exclusive

  • Survivorship and the insolvent estate
  • Cybersecurity actions for 2022
  • Paid leave and backdated claims
  • Exploring imposter syndrome in the legal profession

In this issue

  • Steven Hill: accredited technologist
  • EOTs: a business winner
  • "It's Game On!", law firms say
  • How workflow automation can improve your operations

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited