Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. October 2022
  6. Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Report relating to Ronald Grant Fulton
17th October 2022

Ronald Grant Fulton

A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Ronald Grant Fulton, solicitor, Glasgow. The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in that he breached rules B1.2, B1.4, B1.7, B1.9 and B1.10 of the Law Society of Scotland Practice Rules 2011. The Tribunal censured the respondent and fined him £1,500.

The respondent failed to advise the secondary complainer of the loss of an original deed of variation, and of the potential consequences of that loss. He did not let her know that there was potential for a conflict to arise and that she might have a claim for damages against his firm. He did not tell her to get independent advice. He did not explain the legal consequences or validity of a second deed of variation. He incorrectly dated the testing clause. He did not, as he ought to have done, provide a letter of affidavit setting out what had happened. He did not provide any advice regarding alternative remedies.

Solicitors must be trustworthy and act honestly at all times so that their integrity is beyond question (rule B1.2). They must act in the best interests of their clients. They must not permit their own personal interests to influence their actions or advice (rule B1.4). They must not act for any client where there is a conflict between their own interests and the client’s interests (rule B1.7). They must communicate effectively with their clients (rule B1.9).

They must only act in matters where they are competent to do so, exercising the appropriate level of skill (rule B1.10).

The Tribunal was satisfied that the respondent’s conduct represented a serious and reprehensible departure from the standards of competent and reputable solicitors. He was therefore guilty of professional misconduct. In failing to advise the secondary complainer appropriately, preparing another deed for signature and completing and signing the testing clause which was backdated, the respondent had shown a lack of integrity.

The Author

www.ssdt.org.uk

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: October 2022
  • Book reviews: October 2022
  • Reading for pleasure: October 2022

Perspectives

  • Opinion: James Chalmers
  • President's column: October 2022
  • Editorial: Changed spots?
  • Profile: Lauren Wright
  • Viewpoints: October 2022

Features

  • Five years and growing
  • Immigration appeals: a case apart
  • Short term lets: a new dawn
  • Death by driving: the quest for justice
  • Scottish arbitration: a new era
  • Success: time to reframe
  • Justice: seeking a guiding hand

Briefings

  • Criminal court: Dealing with delay
  • Criminal court: Justiciary Office briefing
  • Licensing: The murky world of insolvency
  • Insolvency: AiB’s powers under review again
  • Tax: A “mini-budget” with big changes
  • Immigration: Scaling up for growth
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Property: New homes codes: setting the record straight
  • Property: In Scots law, what makes a contract a lease?
  • In-house: How to become O shaped

In practice

  • Public policy highlights: October 2022
  • Inclusion: where to begin?
  • New register, new risks
  • Challenge of the written word
  • The Unloved Lawyer: Not quite Boston Legal
  • Ask Ash: Issues over unsolicited help

Online exclusive

  • Solicitors risk Equality Act issues: disability survey
  • An introductory guide to email account security
  • The benefits of passive job searching
  • International arbitration: where to look for growth
  • A Q&A on Spanish law

In this issue

  • Changing the legal aid game
  • Is work-life balance achievable in the law?

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited