Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. August 2023
  6. Public policy highlights

Public policy highlights: August 2023

Recent work of the Society's policy committees, covering Bankruptcy and Diligence (Scotland) Bill; retained EU employment law
14th August 2023

Bankruptcy and diligence

The Society responded to the call for views from the Economy & Fair Work Committee on the Bankruptcy and Diligence (Scotland) Bill.

The bill forms part of a wider move to review and reform the law of statutory debt solutions and diligence, and the Society welcomed this update to the pre-existing legislation. The bill seeks to establish a moratorium on debt recovery action by creditors against individuals who have a mental illness; to make minor and technical modifications to the Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 2016; and to make technical modifications to the law of diligence.

For the Society, the Banking, Company & Insolvency Committee commented on the key issues it believes the Scottish Government should consider when developing a mental health moratorium:

  • The system should not be too prescriptive for parties.
  • Additional resources are required and should be made available for debt advisers dealing with vulnerable clients who are suffering from mental health issues.
  • As creditors and others are often unaware of the differences between Scots law and English law, it may be desirable to align the mental health moratorium with the existing model in England & Wales.
  • There is a lack of clarity regarding the mental health issues that will give rise to the moratorium.
  • The duration of the mental health moratorium is not obvious.

The committee also considered other aspects of the 2016 Act that may benefit from reform, such as the payment of statutory interest on the recall of sequestration.

While the committee is generally supportive of the diligence reform proposals and considers that their overall effects will be positive, it expressed concern that certain parties may be negatively affected.

Read the full response at the Society’s page on the bill.

Retained EU employment law

The Society’s Employment Law Subcommittee responded to the Department for Business & Trade’s consultation on proposed changes to the Working Time Regulations, holiday pay, and the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations following Britain’s exit from the EU.

The response was supportive of legislation to clarify that employers do not have to record workers’ daily hours, noting that this was proportionate to the risk involved, but recommended that record keeping should remain good practice for most employers.

It also welcomed the proposal to create a single statutory leave entitlement, but noted that on any approach it is important that the law provides clarity and certainty for workers and employers. It also supported the introduction of rolled-up holiday pay as an option for employers in relation to all workers, subject to suitable safeguards.

The response acknowledged the arguments for and against proposals to allow small businesses to consult directly with employees on TUPE transfers where there are no employee representatives. However, it also highlighted that the proposed change would simplify and expedite the process while reducing the sense of distance that can be created via the employee representative model.

The response supported changes to allow businesses of any size involved with small transfers of employees to consult directly with their employees, subject to clarification on whether legislation would apply on the basis of the number of employees transferring, or the number of employees affected. It also proposed a number of other areas where clarification or improvement of TUPE regulations would be desirable, including provisions regarding failure to inform or consult, the application of TUPE to workers, and the interaction with data regulations.

Read the full response at the Society’s employment law page. 

Find out more about the Society’s work at www.lawscot.org.uk/research-and-policy/influencing-the-law-and-policy/

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: August 2023
  • Book reviews: August 2023
  • Reading for pleasure: August 2023

Perspectives

  • Opinion: Rebecca Samaras
  • President's column: August 2023
  • Editorial: Crying freedom
  • Profile: Jordan Scott
  • Viewpoints: August 2023

Features

  • AI: opening the door to justice
  • Pursuing a better bill
  • Spinning the bottle: Scotland’s Deposit Return Scheme
  • Broken words: the Illegal Migration Act

Briefings

  • Criminal court: Misdirection?
  • Employment: Putting a cap on non-competes
  • Family: Death and financial provision
  • Human rights: Regulating news broadcast impartiality
  • Pensions: Fraud protection – a report card
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal: August 2023
  • Property: Reservoirs – in on the Act
  • In-house: Trust at the top

In practice

  • Licensed provider update
  • Public policy highlights: August 2023
  • Business development with the WOW Factor
  • Risk: File notes – the when and how
  • Setting the scene for ArbFest
  • Ten years on, five Legal Walks
  • Ask Ash: Attitude problem

Online exclusive

  • The new consumer duty: why all the fuss?
  • E-scooters: riding outside the law
  • Pre-settled status: basis for a claim?
  • “To the best of my recollection”
  • ChatGPT and the future of law

In this issue

  • Steering success and innovation: George Blair interview

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited