You are currently filtering for:
  • in the category: professional regulation
clear filters

“March on Murrayfield”: Anderson replies

Further comments on business ownership and professional independence

The Master Policy: a question for the profession

Whether and how far to bring licensed providers under the Master Policy is being carefully considered by the Society – views are invited

Regulation, new style

The solicitors who work in ABS would be subject to exactly the same professional rules and standards as all solicitors are now

"March on Murrayfield": D&W response

A response to Gilbert Anderson's comments on what was said at public meetings

Polling runs from today

The referendum is open for voting from 23 March until 7 April. Members should receive instructions today

ABS roadshow presentations online

Edinburgh event available to view

External ownership: can we really regulate?

A contrary view to the first three articles posted, based on the difficulties in making regulation work

"March on Murrayfield!"

It's never too late to send a message to Holyrood that external ownership is incompatible with independence

Edinburgh Qs and As

Points from the floor at the Edinburgh ABS roadshow

Decision time approaches

Journal Online's referendum page will be forum for all sides

Thirteen firms call for support of reform

Open letter claims solicitors must have options to ensure level playing field

No stopping the tide

Argument that change is coming, like it or not, and the profession has to get smart in how it faces up to it