Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. News and events
  3. Legal news
  4. Party cannot choose to vary motion timetable: sheriff

Party cannot choose to vary motion timetable: sheriff

8th February 2021 | civil litigation | Civil court work

The timetabling requirements for motions intimated and lodged by email in sheriff court ordinary procedure are mandatory, and it is not within the power of a party lodging a motion to vary them unilaterally, a sheriff has held.

Sheriff Kenneth McGowan in the All Scotland Personal Injury Court gave the decision in relation to a number of motions by a firm of solicitors which were lodged late in relation to the date of intimation, due to the firm being closed between Christmas and New Year. A hearing on the motions took place at the solicitors' request, after the motions were dropped by the court.

In the test case, Gardiner v Abellio Scotrail Ltd, a sist was due to expire on Wednesday 23 December. A reminder was issued to the solicitors and a hearing fixed for 5 January. On 21 December the pursuer's agents intimated to the defenders a motion to discharge that hearing and to fix a new timetable. 

In terms of chapter 15A of the Ordinary Cause Rules, the deadline for opposition should have been 23 December and the motion should have been lodged on 24 December. The form G6A issued by the pursuer's agents indicated that opposition should be intimated by 31 December. The motion was not lodged until 5 January. The court was closed on Friday 25 and Monday 28 December, and Friday 1 and Monday 4 January, but otherwise open on weekdays. The pursuer's solicitors had chosen to close between Christmas and New Year.

The solicitors submitted that while the practice here did not comply with chapter 15A, it was used without objection in the Court of Session, and had been accepted to date in the Personal Injury Court.

Ruling that the requirements in chapter 15A were mandatory, Sheriff McGowan said that to allow a party to vary them unilaterally “would be a recipe for uncertainty where certainty is necessary”. A decision to close for business on a court day “cannot be allowed to constrain the business of other practitioners or the court itself”.

While he was clear that it had never been the policy of the court to grant motions in these circumstances, he could not say that it had never happened. 

“In these circumstances, I accept that the pursuer’s agents may have come to believe (wrongly) that the procedure followed here had the imprimatur of the court. So on this occasion only, I shall treat what has happened as arising from an excusable cause under OCR 2.1(1) and direct that the motion lodged by the pursuer’s agents... be processed and granted.”

He added: “If practitioners decide to organise their business in a way which means they are not in a position to deal with matters which require to be dealt with or otherwise arise on court days, they do so at their peril.”

Click here to view the judgment.

Add To Favorites

Additional

  • News and events

In this section

  • Law Society news
  • CPD & Training
  • Blogs & opinions
  • Events
  • 75th Anniversary

Categories

  • civil litigation
  • criminal law
  • employment
  • obituary
  • careers
  • practice management
  • law society of scotland
  • government-administration
  • welfare/benefits
  • family-child law
  • reparation
  • professional regulation
  • property (non-commercial)
  • insolvency
  • consumer
  • human rights
  • mental health-adult incapacity
  • planning/environment
  • europe
  • information technology
  • immigration
  • education-training
  • executries
  • corporate
  • commercial property
  • agriculture-crofting
  • dispute resolution
  • risk management
  • intellectual property
  • client relations
  • tax
  • licensing
  • banking-financial services
  • trusts-asset management
  • reviews
  • opinion
  • For the public
  • Research and policy
  • Regulation
  • Journal online news
  • interview

News Archive

  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013

Related articles

  • Tea pickers' claim better brought in Kenya: Inner House
  • Ministers set out justice programme through to 2026
  • Fee rises and more cases raise legal aid bill by 14%
  • SLAB consults about A&A and ABWOR policies
Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited