Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. April 2016
  6. Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Report relating to Gerard James McCarron
18th April 2016

A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Gerard James McCarron, McCarron & Co, Airdrie. The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect of his accepting and acting on instructions where he had insufficient competence and appropriate skills, acting for two clients in drawing up a separation agreement where there was a clear conflict of interest at the outset, continuing to act when parties were clearly no longer in an amicable situation, and thereafter continuing to act for one client where the other had instructed alternative solicitors and had complained to the SLCC. The Tribunal censured the respondent.

Issues of conflict of interest are fundamental to a solicitor’s practice. It is for the solicitor to identify any conflict, not a client. It should have been clear from the outset that there was a conflict of interest between both clients in drawing the separation agreement. Whilst it was said that the solicitor was persuaded to act as the clients had stated they were agreed as to the content of any agreement, any experienced solicitor should have recognised the potential for conflict of interest. Continuing to act for both clients when things between them were no longer amicable was clearly inexcusable and fell below the standard to be expected of a competent and reputable solicitor to a degree that could only be considered serious and reprehensible. Separately, the respondent had agreed to act in an area of law where he had no experience. This had no doubt contributed to his failure to identify a blatant conflict of interest. This should emphasise the importance of a solicitor only accepting instructions in an area of law where he has some experience and competence. Whilst the respondent might have taken on these instructions as a result of a desire to help both clients, a desire to help a long established client could not justify a departure from his professional obligations, duties and standards. The Tribunal concluded that the matter could be dealt with appropriately by way of a censure.  

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Family ADR: why the slow takeup?
  • Electronic cigarettes: the medicine of tomorrow?
  • Official advice: must do better
  • Privacy Shield, the new Safe Harbor
  • Maternity: still black marks
  • Designed for justice
  • Reading for pleasure
  • Opinion: Tim Musson
  • Book reviews
  • Profile
  • President's column
  • 20 is the new 40
  • People on the move
  • Stress: the common enemy
  • A safer way to talk
  • Mind the gap
  • SLCC: a role in standards?
  • Budget 2016: a spoonful of sugar?
  • Rights lost to sight?
  • Take care with care services
  • How the Sheriff Appeal Court fits in
  • Extended liability?
  • Periti credere? [Experts believe]
  • What's happening on the review
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Deeds of conditions: emerging stronger
  • In-house and staying in demand
  • Further warning over historic client balances
  • Law reform roundup
  • Perceptions and priorities
  • Training is the key
  • Ask Ash
  • By diverse means
  • The literal truth

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited