Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. March 2018
  6. Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Report relating to Yvonne Robbie
19th March 2018

Yvonne Robbie

A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Yvonne Robbie, solicitor, Dundee. The Tribunal found the respondent not guilty of professional misconduct.

The complaint against the respondent contained three averments of misconduct: (1) the respondent in the knowledge that an interim order had been granted in favour of her client’s opponent in family proceedings in relation to the care and control of their child, advised her client to attend at the school of the child to collect the child in order that the said client might thereby circumvent or frustrate the order of the court; (2) the respondent in affirming in the course of a telephone conversation with the head teacher of the child’s school that there was no legal obstacle to the school handing the child over to the client, as the interim order of the court had not yet been served on that client, thereby misled the head teacher as to the nature and effect of the order of the court in a manner calculated to circumvent or frustrate it; and (3) esto the respondent was not aware of the terms of the interim order, her assertion to the head teacher as to the nature and effect of an order of the court of which she had no clear knowledge represented conduct of a reckless, inaccurate and misleading nature which would have the effect of circumventing or frustrating the order of the court. 

Having considered the evidence led at the hearing, which established that both parents had attended the school on the date in question and it had ultimately been agreed that the respondent’s client could remove the child from the school that day, the Tribunal concluded that misconduct had not been established and declined to refer the matter back to the Council of the Law Society of Scotland in terms of s 53ZA of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980.

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Borrowings, partner capital and profitability
  • GDPR and the cloud
  • Employment claims: is the flood still to come?
  • Contributory fault: drivers, cyclists and pedestrians
  • Reading for pleasure
  • Opinion: Derek McCabe
  • Book reviews
  • Profile: Siobhan Kahmann
  • President's column
  • Application changes coming
  • People on the move
  • Seeking a better way
  • Beyond borders
  • Drawings and profitability
  • Enforceable rights or progressive policy goals?
  • Conflict theory: it works
  • What the liquidators don't tell you
  • The office on the move
  • Please can we have some more?
  • Health check for doctors' lines
  • When creditors come first
  • Keeping goods exclusive
  • Tenant Farming Commissioner: the story so far
  • HSE appeals: experts allowed in
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • Please don't stop the music
  • Broadcasting's business end
  • Public policy highlights
  • Scam warnings escalate
  • This time it's personal
  • The game's not a bogey!
  • "Only amateurs attack machines; professionals target people"
  • When estate agents need client ID
  • Banks, client accounts and the Money Laundering Regulations
  • Third party rights: what now?
  • Ask Ash

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited