In a recent article (Journal, December 2013, 22), I referred to the SLCC’s published analysis of five years’ worth of legal complaints data. One of the conclusions drawn from that analysis was that residential conveyancing attracts more legal complaints than any other area of law. In fact, one in every five complaints which we have received since we opened for business on 1 October 2008 has been about a conveyancing transaction.
In response to that, we have this month launched a guide to help prospective clients avoid some of the most common pitfalls that can lead to complaints against conveyancing practitioners. The guide, Buying or selling your home – a guide for legal consumers, the first in a series specifically written for the users of legal services, is now available for download from the SLCC’s website www.scottishlegalcomplaints.org.uk
Many of the suggestions in the guide will be familiar to readers, and will appear to be not only common sense but also common practice. However, our complaints data tell us that this is not always the case, and, despite the downturn in the housing market, conveyancing remains a high risk area in terms of complaints about inadequate service. With increasing pressures on profit margins, and recognising the time that dealing with a complaint can take, conveyancing is an area where practitioners might well want to focus their attention in terms of complaint avoidance.
To reach a better understanding of the underlying nature of conveyancing complaints, we have carried out detailed analysis of our data.
Typical residential conveyancing complaint v average complaint
This indicates rather interestingly that conveyancing complaints are far less likely to be about fees or costs than the average complaint. This is probably due to the wider use of fixed fees in this area of work. They are also marginally less likely to be about delay.
The areas where a conveyancing complaint is more likely to occur are around ineffective communication, the provision of inadequate advice or a failure to provide information. Clients therefore are not complaining about technical issues or hiccups in the process. The main driver appears to be communication shortcomings which, we would suggest, are more easily avoided.
Last month, the Legal Ombudsman – the body responsible for dealing with legal service complaints in England & Wales – published research on the business case for good complaints handling in legal services. That research, carried out by Economic Insight, suggests that good complaint handling could increase the operational profit of a firm by between 2% and 3%.
In our view, taking steps to avoid complaints in the first place will reap even greater economic benefits and must, therefore, make even better business sense.
In this issue
- Cold case examination of early childhood evidence
- Incentivising employee ownership
- The diversity imperative
- Towards a more inclusive democracy
- Journal magazine Index 2013
- Reading for pleasure
- Opinion: Campbell Read
- Book reviews
- President's column
- RoS's services for solicitors
- Issues for the Union
- Critical mass
- Is this where it ends?
- Testing capacity
- Making plans for auto-enrolment
- Loosening the purse strings
- Data: don't be caught out
- Punished enough?
- Prior statements practice
- Family business musings
- TUPE: armour not gold-plated?
- Pension policy - a vote winner?
- Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
- In with the system
- Check and double-check
- Lender Exchange ahead
- Have you the capital?
- How not to win business: a guide for professionals
- Reflections from the Complaints Commission
- Ask Ash
- Danger spots
- It's the name of the game
- Law reform roundup
- Conference aspires to judicial diversity