Report relating to Murray Alexander McAuley

Murray Alexander McAuley

A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Murray Alexander Thomas McAuley, solicitor, Coatbridge. The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in cumulo in respect of his failure (a) to respond to correspondence from the Society; (b) to obtemper statutory notices served on him by the Society; and (c) to pay the professional fees of a doctor for reports instructed by him.

The Tribunal censured the respondent and directed in terms of s 53(5) of the Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980 that any practising certificate issued to the respondent shall be subject to such restriction as will limit him to acting as a qualified assistant to such employer as may be approved by the Council of the Society or its Practising Certificate Subcommittee, for an aggregate period of one year.

The Tribunal has emphasised on a number of occasions the importance of solicitors dealing promptly and efficiently with correspondence from the Society in performing its statutory duties. Solicitors who fail to engage in the process bring the system into disrepute. It is impossible to see how the public can have any faith in the profession unless the profession upholds its duty to cooperate with its regulatory body. The public is also entitled to expect that solicitors be fair in their dealings with witnesses/professional parties. A solicitor is expected to accept personal responsibility for the expenses incurred by professional witnesses, and the respondent in failing to make payment over an extended period, and in failing to give any response to the doctor, brought the profession into disrepute. Even before the Tribunal, the respondent failed to demonstrate any insight into the fundamental importance of a solicitor’s duty to co-operate with his regulatory body.

In these circumstances the Tribunal felt it appropriate to restrict the respondent’s practising certificate for  one year to acting as an employee, allowing him to return to practice but ensuring that he would be supervised and the interests of the public protected.

Share this article
Add To Favorites