Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. February 2018
  6. Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal

Report relating to Torquil MacLeod
19th February 2018

Torquil MacLeod

A complaint was made by the Council of the Law Society of Scotland against Torquil F MacLeod, formerly of Torquil MacLeod & Co, 5 Longman Road, Inverness. The Tribunal found the respondent guilty of professional misconduct in respect that he charged grossly excessive fees to an executry and failed to render fee notes in respect of the fees taken. The Tribunal censured the respondent and fined him £3,000.

The Tribunal found the respondent’s conduct was sufficiently serious and reprehensible to amount to professional misconduct. He had charged fees grossly in excess of what the auditor considered to be fair and reasonable. He had done this based on an agreement to charge a percentage fee which was not included in the terms of business letter or ever reduced to writing. In addition, he failed to render those fee notes to the executors properly so that they were aware of the fees and the basis for them. Ordinarily, the Tribunal views overcharging very seriously. The respondent made a significant error of judgment. However, this was an isolated incident rather than a repeated course of conduct. He had a previously unblemished record. He admitted professional misconduct. In the circumstances of this case, the Tribunal did not consider that the public would be at risk if the respondent continued to practise unsupervised. However, the Tribunal thought it appropriate to mark the seriousness of the conduct with a substantial fine. Therefore, a fine of £3,000 was imposed.

www.ssdt.org.uk
Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

In this issue

  • Enforceable rights or progressive policy goals?
  • Data processors beware: GDPR holds you responsible too
  • Insolvency in a post-Carillion world
  • Employee ownership: a strategy that fits
  • A mediation Act? The Irish experience
  • Journal magazine index 2017
  • Reading for pleasure
  • Opinion: Andrew Tickell
  • Book reviews
  • Profile
  • President's column
  • Digital progress given go ahead
  • People on the move
  • Tipping point for legal aid?
  • Arrest: all change
  • Legal software: are you still listening to Gangnam style?
  • Defamation law for the digital age
  • Choosing our judges: could we do it better?
  • A journey through trust compliance
  • The Cashroom: 10 years of service
  • From dockets to defences
  • Sex discrimination runs deep
  • Wealth not a bar to s 28 claims
  • No spying on the job
  • Scottish Solicitors Staff Pension Fund: not the final instalment?
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal
  • The Clark Foundation for Legal Education
  • LBTT's birthday alert
  • Doing all the white stuff
  • Solicitor's CBE for life of service
  • From the Brussels office
  • Paralegal pointers
  • Public policy highlights
  • The kindest cut
  • Wish list for the review
  • Benchmarking: take the benefits
  • Tax evasion: don't get caught up
  • Ask Ash
  • Time to call out harassment
  • Q & A corner

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited