Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. March 2020
  6. Opinion: Val Dougan

Opinion: Val Dougan

In the month of International Women’s Day, is law still a man’s world? Research illustrates that much needs to change, at societal as well as professional level, for that no longer to hold true
16th March 2020 | Val Dougan

Is law still a man’s world, it has been asked?

Val DouganEquality for me has never been about blaming men, so I prefer to ask: does law work equally well for men and women? The answer is no, it doesn’t, but the same could be said across the world of work. In my view we need to rethink the way we work, and adapt the system so both sexes can have the same opportunities.

We have seen huge changes in the legal profession. But the nub of the issue remains how we manage our lives beyond work. The system was not designed to take into account how we care for others. That’s mostly about children, but not always. A bar chart in the Profile of the Profession survey highlights that of 103 people with pre-school care, one man was the primary carer, compared to 102 women (and four men compared to 142 women during primary school years). That needs to change, and most of that is not in an employer’s gift. A great deal is about culture and roles. I see women facing tough decisions as they make trade-offs to juggle their career and their children. Men (on the whole) do not face the same challenges.

Despite these challenges, in the last five years 63% of newly admitted solicitors were female, a trend that seems set to continue.

We start to see the design flaw as women progress. Only 32% of partners in Scotland are women, and the Profile of the Profession sample indicates that this reduces to 6% at equity level. Our gender pay gap sits at 23%, higher than the Scottish average of 15%.

Increasingly law firms are asking the difficult question, why the missing 18% of women at partnership level? It can be done. In my team, for instance, we have seven female partners and four men.

Rob Marrs at the Society and I have discussed this. His point is: why demand diversity at pitch stage and then place demands on colleagues that mean late night working, with the obvious knock-on impact on carers? I know the Society is trying to promote an open conversation from private practice and in-house solicitors on this. I’m not sure men want to work like that either, and I’d love men to get more involved.

Realistically I think it will take a long time to move away from this breadwinner model of work, which was set up in the days when someone else was at home looking after the kids, but steps like the Mindful Business Charter are making inroads with this.

Law is a high-performing environment, which can often entail long working hours. We need to make changes like embracing job sharing at senior levels, and we need to see more men working flexibly and taking more of a role in sharing childcare. Agile working is becoming more commonplace, but is still not common. These are big issues that are wider than the legal profession and are not going to change overnight, nor can they be placed solely on the shoulders of employers.

In the recent past, the Law Society of Scotland has done a lot in this area. The biggest single move was the voluntary equality standards launched a few years ago, which I’ve been involved with from the early days. They haven’t been taken up as much as we’d like, so we will consult on a requirement to have an equality lead in each organisation in the future.

The team have also done a lot of work with other organisations to support initiatives to celebrate the 100 years of women in law, and in 2020 the Society will consult on a regulatory requirement, and launch training on unconscious bias and guidance on mainstreaming flexible working for all.

I am hopeful that this generation of new dads who have known shared parental leave will remain engaged in their children’s lives and share that responsibility. A huge part of achieving change has to be about bringing men on board. We need to normalise gender balance from trainee to partnership level and talk about the benefits to everyone.

The Author

Val Dougan is a professional support lawyer with CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP, Glasgow, and a member of the Law Society of Scotland’s Equality & Diversity Committee

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • Book reviews: March 2020
  • Profile: Jim Drysdale
  • People on the move: March 2020

Perspectives

  • Opinion: Val Dougan
  • Letters: March 2020
  • President's column

Features

  • Roberton: a better alternative
  • Nikah-only marriage: a Scottish remedy?
  • Shining a light on arbitration
  • Beyond the books
  • Appropriate adults: a legal framework
  • A brief history of (the law on) time

Briefings

  • Reach of case management
  • Hello Brexit, bye bye streaming portability?
  • Home defeat for Liverpool
  • When it pays less to network
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal – Mar 20
  • CGT: early reporting for all
  • ILC welcomes new faces

In practice

  • Price transparency: how does it work?
  • TCSP: themes from the review
  • The best of times; the worst of times
  • SPA roundup
  • Not so good to go
  • Ask Ash

Online exclusive

  • Reading for pleasure: March 2020
  • Price transparency: why you should pay attention
  • Deepfakes, and how to avoid them
  • Working round the virus
  • Equal pay: a material defence?
  • Territorial scope strikes twice more

In this issue

  • Why should a software supplier be independent?
  • Would you drive your car without a dashboard?

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited