Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. March 2020
  6. TCSP: themes from the review

TCSP: themes from the review

As the report of the thematic review of trust and company service provision by Scottish law firms is published, the author explains more about the review and what it revealed
16th March 2020 | Alex White
What is a thematic review, and why start using it now?

Thematics are a focused research method which can use both quantitative and qualitative data to measure behaviours. They serve as a useful tool to both inform the Society of trends in the profession but also, importantly, to inform those under our supervision about how they can ensure their compliance with the Money Laundering Regulations as well as the Society’s practice rules.

Why did you choose trust and company services provision (TCSP) as the focus of your first thematic review?

The UK National Risk Assessment published by HM Treasury, initially in 2015, highlighted specific trust and company services as being of an inherent high risk to criminal exploitation. Their assessment in 2017 remains the same. The Society acknowledged this risk and proactively sought to address it by recruiting an AML auditor with TCSP-specific experience. One of my main objectives was to get a clearer understanding of how firms conduct themselves when delivering such services, and also to inform firms of what we expect from them when acting as a TCSP. However, as highlighted in the report, the principles of having effective systems and controls in place when delivering regulated services applies regardless.

What key themes did the report reveal?

Stage one of the review – a questionnaire issued to 30 firms – produced some encouraging data. However, when we took four of those firms to stage three, we found that not all firms fully considered and acknowledged trust and/or company services in their firm level risk assessment and policies, controls and procedures. There were issues with producing AML-specific files relating to client matters and relationships in a timely manner, and instances of participating firms failing to monitor client relationships and to document their knowledge of the client. It is important to stress that the size of the cohort was relatively small and may not be indicative of the profession as a whole; however, firms should consider the findings of the report and work to ensure that their own internal controls are effective to prevent and forestall their services from use and abuse. One file review revealed that fee earners were not aware that provision of a registered office service to clients is in scope of the regulations. Other firms were not conversant of their statutory requirements when offering this service.

Why is it so important that Scottish law firms have robust AML policies, controls and procedures in place?

It is crucial that all firms, regardless of their size, take the time to consider all in-scope services offered to their client base and adhere to effective policies, controls and procedures (PCPs) if they are to fulfil their obligations and comply with the regulations.

But carefully considered and drafted PCPs aren’t simply a statutory requirement. They act as an invaluable reference point and source of support for legal staff providing clear direction on how they should conduct themselves in particular situations. If planned, used and maintained correctly, sufficiently robust PCPs can help to mitigate the risks of a firm’s legitimate legal services being abused for criminal purposes.

What’s next? Do you plan to use thematic reviews again?

We are still working to determine the theme and timing of the next thematic review. However, it is our intention to increase the number of firms selected to participate in the next review, to give us more comprehensive, detailed data which, in turn, will feed into our risk-based approach to supervision and the insight we can provide to firms. We will keep our members up to date with progress and details of the theme in advance of firm selection.

The Author

Alex White is the Law Society of Scotland's anti-money laundering auditor

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • Book reviews: March 2020
  • Profile: Jim Drysdale
  • People on the move: March 2020

Perspectives

  • Opinion: Val Dougan
  • Letters: March 2020
  • President's column

Features

  • Roberton: a better alternative
  • Nikah-only marriage: a Scottish remedy?
  • Shining a light on arbitration
  • Beyond the books
  • Appropriate adults: a legal framework
  • A brief history of (the law on) time

Briefings

  • Reach of case management
  • Hello Brexit, bye bye streaming portability?
  • Home defeat for Liverpool
  • When it pays less to network
  • Scottish Solicitors' Discipline Tribunal – Mar 20
  • CGT: early reporting for all
  • ILC welcomes new faces

In practice

  • Price transparency: how does it work?
  • TCSP: themes from the review
  • The best of times; the worst of times
  • SPA roundup
  • Not so good to go
  • Ask Ash

Online exclusive

  • Reading for pleasure: March 2020
  • Price transparency: why you should pay attention
  • Deepfakes, and how to avoid them
  • Working round the virus
  • Equal pay: a material defence?
  • Territorial scope strikes twice more

In this issue

  • Why should a software supplier be independent?
  • Would you drive your car without a dashboard?

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited