Skip to content
Law Society of Scotland
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
Search
Find a Solicitor
Contact us
About us
Sign in
  • For members

    • For members

    • CPD & Training

    • Membership and fees

    • Rules and guidance

    • Regulation and compliance

    • Journal

    • Business support

    • Career growth

    • Member benefits

    • Professional support

    • Lawscot Wellbeing

    • Lawscot Sustainability

  • News and events

    • News and events

    • Law Society news

    • Blogs & opinions

    • CPD & Training

    • Events

  • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying and education

    • Qualifying as a Scottish solicitor

    • Career support and advice

    • Our work with schools

    • Lawscot Foundation

    • Funding your education

    • Social mobility

  • Research and policy

    • Research and policy

    • Research

    • Influencing the law and policy

    • Equality and diversity

    • Our international work

    • Legal Services Review

    • Meet the Policy team

  • For the public

    • For the public

    • What solicitors can do for you

    • Making a complaint

    • Client protection

    • Find a Solicitor

    • Frequently asked questions

    • Your Scottish solicitor

  • About us

    • About us

    • Contact us

    • Who we are

    • Our strategy, reports and plans

    • Help and advice

    • Our standards

    • Work with us

    • Our logo and branding

    • Equality and diversity

  1. Home
  2. For members
  3. Journal Archive
  4. Issues
  5. October 2020
  6. Book reviews: October 2020

Book reviews: October 2020

Reviews of Financial Provision on Divorce and Dissolution of Civil Partnerships (Bailey and McCall); Enemies of the People? (Rozenberg)
15th October 2020

Financial Provision on Divorce and Dissolution of Civil Partnerships 

2nd edition


Alan Bailey and Ruth McCall

PUBLISHER: W GREEN
ISBN: 978-0414035539
PRICE: £69

Financial Provision on Divorce and Dissolution of Civil Partnerships states on its cover that it is written by lawyers for lawyers, and this description could not be more accurate.

The book is well set out, with nine chapters covering an overview of financial provision, s 8 orders, s 9 principles, the relevant date, matrimonial law and partnership property, special circumstances, interim aliment and miscellaneous matters.

Each chapter is then broken down into a general discussion, then the specifics of each sub-section of the Act together with case law and practical tips.

The book and its various chapters go into extensive detail in relation to each of the sections of the Family Law (Scotland) Act 1985, and it would be hard to find any aspect of financial provision which is not covered.

The pension section, covered under s 8 orders, makes what is generally a complicated subject easy to understand. The chapter on s 9 claims includes a helpful cases section showing successful and unsuccessful arguments.

Apart from the cases annotated in the footnotes, there are also tables of cases at the end of the various chapters.

Due to lockdown, this book has been sitting on my desk to review for some time, and I have to say it is already well thumbed. It provides all the answers to all the questions you did not even know you wanted to ask. It is definitely one for practitioners to carry in their briefcase, and is a must have for anyone dealing in any aspect of family law.

Kathryn Wilson, Melrose & Porteous

Enemies of the People? How Judges Shape Society

Joshua Rozenberg

PUBLISHER: BRISTOL UNIVERSITY PRESS
ISBN: 978-1529204520
PRICE: £14.99 (E-BOOK £10.04)

Joshua Rozenberg aptly and judiciously poses the notorious phrase in the title of his book as a question, in contrast to the sensationalist, egregious headline of the Daily Mail on 4 November 2016, following the judgment of the Lord Chief Justice and his colleagues that the Government required the consent of Parliament to invoke article 50 commencing the withdrawal of the UK from the European Union. The phrase has a long history, beginning in Roman times, through to regular reference during the French Revolution, a play by Ibsen, and the President of the United States referring to fake news by certain media outlets. In essence, it seeks to denote the will of the minority frustrating the will of the majority.

Rozenberg has written a highly readable yet sophisticated book. He takes several areas of law where he examines in a clear, erudite fashion the decisions of the courts, contrasting them with the criticism made that those decisions demonstrated judicial activism leading to decisions said to be unwarranted or even unlawful. Inevitably, he analyses the decision delivered by the Supreme Court in Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5. However, he demonstrates that in other areas of the law, academics can be vociferous in their criticisms of the senior judiciary.

An example is a statement issued by the Judicial Power Project that “The Supreme Court’s decision today, Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, undermines the rule of law and violates the sovereignty of parliament. A majority of the court (four of seven judges) has chosen to misinterpret an ouster clause – the statutory provision which expressly limits the High Court’s jurisdiction to review decisions of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Parliament chose to limit judicial review by creating a specialist tribunal to consider complaints against the intelligence services. It is not the Supreme Court’s place to unravel this choice by way of implausible and unreasonable statutory interpretation... It is clear that some Supreme Court judges have a wholly misconceived idea of their place in our constitution... These three judges have asserted an intention in the future openly to disobey statute. Any judge who acted on this intention would warrant removal from office in accordance with the terms of the Senior Courts Act 1981.”

Rozenberg's conclusion is that “In reality, Carnwath, Hale and Kerr were not refusing to give effect to a future ouster clause. They were simply predicting that they might not interpret a clause in the way that lawyers such as [those who issued the statement] were arguing for. The Privacy International ruling shows a clear division between Carnwath, Hale and Kerr, at the activist end of the spectrum, and their colleagues Sumption, Reed and Wilson, who took a more literal approach to statutory interpretation – with Lloyd-Jones somewhere in the middle.”

The author begins with an engaging overview of the overarching framework within which judicial activism can be scrutinised: separation of powers, the common law and how judges can develop the law through its application and interpretation (helpfully picked up in his chapter on the sweeping away of the marital defence to rape), devolved powers and the Human Rights Act. Thereafter, chapters follow a patterned discussion, analysing the case law and the reaction to it.

In doing so, the author clarifies and, for the non-legal mind, demystifies with crystal clear insight, the ratio of the judgments. So, we are given analysis of gay rights, marital rape, Miller, discrimination, press freedom, divorce and assisted suicide. Judge made law is central to the three legal systems of the UK, contrasting sharply with the codified system of most other states. Rosenberg demonstrates how this flexible approach has developed not only the law but its role within modern society.

While not written as a textbook, the book could usefully be read by students to give them an insight into the judicial mind, the approach and considerations judges take in their decision making and the sensitivity and moral courage required to do so. In my early studies we read The Politics of the Judiciary, by Professor Griffiths, who argued that judges can never be truly independent, and The Discipline of Law by Lord Denning, who argued that the principles of law laid down by 19th century judges were no longer suitable to the issues in 20th century society. More recently, Lord Sumption addressed the issue of judicial overreach in his Reith Lectures. Rozenberg gives us a more nuanced insight into Lord Sumption's decisions. Great food for thought.

David J Dickson, solicitor advocate and review editor

Share this article
Add To Favorites
https://lawware.co.uk/

Regulars

  • People on the move: October 2020
  • Reading for pleasure: October 2020
  • Book reviews: October 2020

Perspectives

  • Opinion: Elaine Motion
  • Letters: October 2020
  • President's column: October 2020
  • Editorial: October 2020
  • Profile: Olivia Moore

Features

  • Lessons from the class of 2008
  • Children first, by rights
  • Tech wherever you turn
  • Skelping away
  • ADR: get one jump ahead
  • Law and wellbeing: how far at odds?

Briefings

  • Criminal court: The limits of Moorov
  • Licensing: Remote board hearings – the future?
  • Family: Clad with problems
  • Insolvency: Creditors lose interest
  • Tax: Changed VAT treatment – COVID-suitable?
  • Contracts: E-signatures: silos, concerns and top tips
  • Data protection: Year of disruption

In practice

  • The Word of Gold: Shaken and stirred?
  • A matter of opinion
  • Corporate and commercial risks: drafting and dabbling
  • Black history: Scottish history
  • Ask Ash: October 2020
  • Crime at an uncertain time
  • Trained to deliver

Online exclusive

  • An extension to an extension: pre-irritancy notices
  • Brexit, the UK Internal Market Bill and devolution
  • Remote working and employment rights
  • Article 14: the Strasbourg court's approach
  • “Go the Extra Mile” for Pro Bono Week

In this issue

  • 2020 hindsight: making good use of the lockdown
  • Help as you take the plunge
  • "Buy 'Scottish' land – they're not making it any more"
  • Royal Faculty building set for renovation work

Recent Issues

Dec 2023
Nov 2023
Oct 2023
Sept 2023
Search the archive

Additional

Law Society of Scotland
Atria One, 144 Morrison Street
Edinburgh
EH3 8EX
If you’re looking for a solicitor, visit FindaSolicitor.scot
T: +44(0) 131 226 7411
E: lawscot@lawscot.org.uk
About us
  • Contact us
  • Who we are
  • Strategy reports plans
  • Help and advice
  • Our standards
  • Work with us
Useful links
  • Find a Solicitor
  • Sign in
  • CPD & Training
  • Rules and guidance
  • Website terms and conditions
Law Society of Scotland | © 2025
Made by Gecko Agency Limited